Home
Now Our Family Policy Is Sorted, Let's Talk the Foreign Variety

Now Our Family Policy Is Sorted, Let's Talk the Foreign Variety

I thought I'd never find a good thing to say about Dave, but I was wrong.

King James and Unity

King James and Unity

King James VI and I made an effort to bring Scotland, his first kingdom, together with England. He launched a new currency called the Unite and made several attempts at a Union flag (below). On...

The Young Victims of Rotherham Council's Anti-Racism Policies

The Young Victims of Rotherham Council's Anti-Racism Policies

According to the latest enquiry into Muslim sexual grooming gangs in Rotherham, at least 1,400 children were subjected to sexual exploitation between 1997 and 2013.

How Crooked Rotherham MP Denis MacShane Lined His Pockets While Pakistanis Gang-Raped Rotherham's Children

How Crooked Rotherham MP Denis MacShane Lined His Pockets While Pakistanis Gang-Raped Rotherham's Children

The MP for Rotherham at the time of the widespread Muslim sexual abuse of children was Denis MacShane, who in December 2013 was jailed for financial fraud.

Does the Coalition Government Have the Faintest Idea What its Policy on IS and Syria Is Supposed to Be?

Does the Coalition Government Have the Faintest Idea What its Policy on IS and Syria Is Supposed to Be?

Does the coalition government have the faintest idea what its policy on the Islamic State (IS) and Syria is supposed to be? In the aftermath of the brutal murder of James Foley by a terrorist...

Out of Africa ... to Where?

Out of Africa ... to Where?

I have written several times before about the rapidly changing global demography, but sometimes a message needs to be repeated until it sinks in. Just ask Coca-Cola.

  • Now Our Family Policy Is Sorted, Let's Talk the Foreign Variety

    Now Our Family Policy Is Sorted, Let's Talk the Foreign Variety

    Thursday, 28 August 2014 23:49
  • King James and Unity

    King James and Unity

    Thursday, 28 August 2014 22:51
  • The Young Victims of Rotherham Council's Anti-Racism Policies

    The Young Victims of Rotherham Council's Anti-Racism Policies

    Wednesday, 27 August 2014 20:26
  • How Crooked Rotherham MP Denis MacShane Lined His Pockets While Pakistanis Gang-Raped Rotherham's Children

    How Crooked Rotherham MP Denis MacShane Lined His Pockets While Pakistanis Gang-Raped Rotherham's...

    Wednesday, 27 August 2014 12:27
  • Does the Coalition Government Have the Faintest Idea What its Policy on IS and Syria Is Supposed to Be?

    Does the Coalition Government Have the Faintest Idea What its Policy on IS and Syria Is Supposed...

    Sunday, 24 August 2014 15:49
  • Out of Africa ... to Where?

    Out of Africa ... to Where?

    Sunday, 24 August 2014 14:58

 

 

MPACUK Blames the Woolwich Murder on the West

The leader of the Muslim Public Affairs Committee (MPACUK), Asghar Bukhari (above), when interviewed by the BBC, placed the entire blame for the murder in Woolwich on the West:

"What is the government likely to do apart from condemn the violence and deny the link between our own foreign policy and domestic acts of violence by some of Britain's Muslims? Nothing whatsoever. Despite the Muslim Public Affairs Committee's efforts, the depressingly predictable and familiar cycle of violence is likely to continue until the government accepts the real link between the two. Only then will any solution be within reach." – MPACUK, 23.5.2013

Bukhari didn't have a single word to say about totalitarian Islamism and certainly not about jihad in Islam itself or in the Koran. No. The kuffar, as always, is entirely to blame. And Muslims, as always, are only passive victims. But there's nothing new here.

Even when Muhammad, and later Muslim leaders, invaded all the surrounding empires and countries, they said it was all a matter of defence. The Muslim imperialists conquered a third of the world defensively. After all, as the saying goes, the best form of defence is attack.

So Muslims rationalise their endless acts of aggression and war in terms of defence and their being attacked by infidels. That's also the language of the Koran. The gimmick of defence was also used by Adolf Hitler when he first invaded the Sudetenland, then the rest of Czechoslovakia, then Poland. All these countries were said to be either a threat to Germany or had supposedly already attacked it.

Asghar Bukhari specifically singles out Afghanistan and Iraq. Nonetheless, Western troops no longer 'occupy' Iraq. This country now has a Shia Muslim government. That's unless MPACUK is condoning retrospective retribution or revenge for what Western troops did in Iraq.

As for Afghanistan, there are 66,000 US troops in that country. Despite that, there are vast swathes of the country in which there are no Western soldiers at all. Of course 66,000 soldiers can still do much damage; but it still can't be called an 'occupation' (a buzzword from both the Left and from Muslims).

MPACUK has also conveniently forgotten why we went into Afghanistan in the first place – because of 9/11 and the numerous terrorist bases that litter that country and the Pakistani borders with Afghanistan. If we hadn't gone in, the Taliban would probably rule the entire country today. Maybe this is what's truly behind the Islamists of MPACUK – they didn't mind the prospect of complete Taliban rule in Afghanistan (just as the Islamist leaders of Pakistan wanted, and still want, the Taliban to rule there).

Let's stop the bullshit. It's not 'all about Afghanistan and Iraq'.

Take Osama bin Laden. He was mainly motivated by the presence of US personnel in Saudi Arabia (certainly not 'occupiers'), not by Afghanistan, Iraq or even Palestine. Take another example. Three pre-Afghanistan and pre-Iraq bombings were carried out by Muslim group in 1977 in Washington. These bombings were a response to the showing of a 'blasphemous' film about the prophet Mohammed.

And what about all the Islamic acts of violence and terrorism that aren't anything to do with Iraq, Afghanistan or any 'occupations'? What about the bombing of the Charlie Hebdo offices in Paris? The fatwa on Salman Rushdie? The riots and deaths because of the Muhammad cartoons and the film Innocence of Muslims? The killing of Pim Fortuyn and Theo van Gogh? The Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood started its own bombing, assassination and killing campaign in the 1920s. Islamic terrorism continued up to the 1960s and beyond. The list is endless.

MPACUK's focus on Afghanistan is disingenuous in the extreme.

Islamists will always rationalise jihad in terms of defence. This has happened throughout those 1,350 years of jihad. Islamist bombings will still occur even if we pulled out of Afghanistan. And what about MPACUK's other rationalisation of jihad and its real monomania – Israel?

It doesn't matter about foreign interventions: many Muslims kill people simply because they are 'unbelievers'. The deaths and persecutions in the Muslim world are largely carried out by minds oblivious to any Western interventions; they are about jihad and sharia law – about Islam. The Islamic jihad reached its peak when the Islamic world was the great power; not when it was 'oppressed' by the West.

------

"MPACUK calls on Muslims to get a little extreme; no we call on Muslims to get very extreme. The time for moderation is over, the time for passive acceptance is gone, no longer are we held back by empty platitudes of 'serving the community'. Muslims need to get active and get vocal now ..." - MPACUK, 2010

MAPCUK also calls for more 'democratic activity' from Muslims; but democratic activity only when it comes to Islamic issues and the situation of Muslims in the world. MPACUK is utterly communalist/ sectarian in nature – as its name suggests. Everything it says is said through either the prism of Islam or the situation of Muslims in the UK or abroad. In fact it's hardly worth stressing 'democratic involvement' at all if that involvement is completely determined by Islam and the affairs of Muslims as Muslims. MPACUK may as well agitate for full sharia law – it would have the same results.

Despite all that, MPACUK has also spoken out against democratic activity; though it hasn't spoken out against political activity. It has called for Muslims 'to get more extreme' and much else. It is taking, in fact, the Muslim Brotherhood approach of using democracy and democratic means to further the cause of Islam and Muslims – ultimately, to bring about sharia law and Muslim self-rule. All this, again, partly through the means of British democratic processes.

MPACUK is not against Islamic terrorism. It rationalises, justifies and explains it. Nonetheless, like the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood, it also believes that by using Western (non-Islamic) democratic processes, it can further both Islam and the cause of Muslims. That is, MPACUK essentially uses democracy in order to destroy democracy. That's why it prefers 'democratic involvement' to what it sees as often counter-productive examples of Islamic terrorism.

Share
comments

Help us create a brand new Liberty GB website!

Paul Weston: The Left's Anti-White Racism

Subscribe to mailing list

* indicates required
 
Email Format
 

You may also like...

Liberty GB fighting to protect British culture, heritage and freedoms. More...

  • Tab 1

            

            

            

            

     

    More videos at the Liberty GB YouTube channel.

  • Tab 2

    Liberty GB

    Liberty GB will address all the political issues Great Britain currently faces, something the three main parties (along with UKIP) so conspicuously fail to do. The Liberal Democrats, Labour and Conservatives manifestly refuse to discuss the most important issues of our time, namely mass immigration from the EU and Third World, the steady rise of fundamentalist Islam and the hijacking of traditional British culture and institutions by well-organised left-wing 'progressives'. There is no guarantee at such a late stage that Britain can be saved, but Liberty GB will endeavour to put a stop to our rapidly accelerating descent into economic, educational, moral, cultural and social ruin. Britain could be a wonderful country again, but it will take politics bordering on the revolutionary to achieve this vision. If you are of similar mind, Liberty GB welcomes your participation.

     

     
     

     

     
     
     

 

British Culture

Over the past several decades the liberal left has enforced an unpopular programme of multiculturalism upon the people of this country.

Read more...

 

Defence

To almost everybody in Great Britain today it must seem obvious that our Armed Forces are in a state of crisis and decline. This sorry state of affairs has not come about overnight.

Read more...

 

Freedom and Democracy

Freedom and democracy are under attack in Britain, and none of the mainstream parties seem much concerned.

Read more...

 

Transport

Hydrogen fuel cells and hybrid technologies can help to reduce pollution, but the building of ever more roads is no solution to the transport crisis.

Read more...

Mission Statement

Liberty GB will address all the political issues Great Britain currently faces, something the three main parties (along with UKIP) so conspicuously fail to do. The Liberal Democrats, Labour and Conservatives manifestly refuse to discuss the most important issues of our time, namely mass immigration from the EU and Third World, the steady rise of fundamentalist Islam and the hijacking of traditional British culture and institutions by well-organised left-wing 'progressives'. There is no guarantee at such a late stage that Britain can be saved, but Liberty GB will endeavour to put a stop to our rapidly accelerating descent into economic, educational, moral, cultural and social ruin. Britain could be a wonderful country again, but it will take politics bordering on the revolutionary to achieve this vision. If you are of similar mind, Liberty GB welcomes your participation.

Contact Us

We'd very much like to hear from you.

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.